Planet

Home > Services > Sanctions

International Sanctions Removal Lawyers

Specialist lawyers challenging OFAC, EU, UK, and UN sanctions designations. We advise individuals, businesses, and state entities on sanctions compliance, designation challenges, and asset unfreezing across all major sanctions regimes.

Get Free Consultation

International Sanctions Removal Lawyers

What Are International Sanctions?

International sanctions are restrictive measures imposed by governments and international organisations — including the United States (OFAC), European Union, United Kingdom, and United Nations — against individuals, businesses, and governments accused of specific conduct. Sanctions can include:

Asset freezes — all assets held in or passing through sanctioning jurisdictions are frozen, preventing access to bank accounts, property, and investments
Travel bans — prohibition on entering or transiting through the sanctioning territory
Transaction prohibitions — businesses and individuals in the sanctioning jurisdiction are prohibited from dealing with the designated party
Arms embargoes and technology restrictions — prohibitions on the supply of specified goods and services

Being designated on a sanctions list — such as the US OFAC SDN list, the EU Consolidated List, the UK sanctions list, or UN Security Council sanctions — has devastating consequences for personal freedom, business operations, and reputation. Many designations are made without adequate evidence or due process, and can be successfully challenged.

Sanctions Regimes We Challenge

Our Sanctions Defence Services

Frequently Asked Questions on Sanctions

How do I know if I am on a sanctions list?

You can search the OFAC SDN list at ofac.treas.gov, the EU Consolidated List at eeas.europa.eu, and the UK sanctions list at gov.uk/government/publications/financial-sanctions-consolidated-list-of-targets. However, many individuals discover they are designated only when their bank account is frozen or a transaction is declined. Our lawyers provide a comprehensive multi-regime screening service to check your status across all major sanctions programs.

Can a sanctions designation be challenged?

Yes. Sanctions designations by OFAC, the EU, the UK, and the UN can all be challenged through administrative reconsideration procedures and, in many cases, through judicial review. Successful challenges are achieved where the designation is based on insufficient evidence, factual errors, guilt-by-association without independent evidence, or where circumstances have materially changed since designation. Our lawyers have experience in delisting proceedings across all major sanctions regimes.

What is the difference between OFAC and EU sanctions?

OFAC (US Treasury) sanctions have the widest extraterritorial reach — they apply to all US persons globally and can affect non-US banks and businesses through secondary sanctions. EU sanctions apply within EU territory and to EU persons. UK sanctions, post-Brexit, operate independently from EU measures. Being designated under one regime does not automatically result in designation under others, though many designations are coordinated. We advise on the specific implications of each regime for your situation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I challenge a sanctions designation if I was never notified before being listed?

Yes, lack of prior notification does not preclude a challenge and may strengthen it. Many sanctions regimes, particularly OFAC and EU measures, permit designation without advance notice based on concerns about asset flight. However, the European Court of Justice has repeatedly held that inadequate disclosure of reasons or evidence supporting designation violates fundamental rights of defence. A challenge can argue that the designating authority failed to provide a sufficient statement of reasons, that the evidence relied upon was never disclosed, or that the designation was based on outdated or inaccurate intelligence. These procedural deficiencies can form independent grounds for annulment.

What standard of proof must the sanctioning authority meet to maintain my designation?

The standard varies by regime but is generally lower than criminal proof. OFAC requires only ‘reason to believe’ based on credible evidence, while EU courts apply a ‘sufficiently solid factual basis’ test established in cases like Kadi II. The UK applies a ‘reasonable grounds to suspect’ threshold under the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018. Crucially, the burden lies with the designating authority to justify the listing — not with the designated person to prove innocence. Successful challenges often demonstrate that underlying intelligence is stale, misattributed, or fails to establish the required nexus to sanctionable conduct.

How long does a sanctions delisting challenge typically take?

Timelines vary significantly by jurisdiction and procedure. Administrative reviews before OFAC typically take 6–18 months, though complex cases extend longer. EU judicial challenges before the General Court average 18–30 months to judgment, with expedited procedures available in urgent cases. UK administrative review requests to OFSI should receive initial response within 28 days, but substantive reconsideration takes 3–12 months. UN Ombudsperson proceedings under the 1267 regime require approximately 8–10 months. During proceedings, interim relief applications can sometimes achieve partial asset access or travel permissions pending final determination.

Will being removed from one sanctions list automatically remove me from others?

No, each sanctions regime operates independently and requires separate challenge. Delisting from the EU Consolidated List does not affect OFAC SDN status, and vice versa. Even within the UN system, removal from Security Council lists does not automatically update national implementing measures. However, a successful delisting in one jurisdiction creates persuasive precedent and evidentiary material useful in parallel challenges. Coordinated multi-jurisdictional strategy is essential — particularly where the same underlying allegations form the basis for designation across regimes — to ensure delisting arguments are consistent and that favourable decisions are leveraged effectively elsewhere.

Can secondary sanctions affect me even if I am not personally designated?

Yes, secondary sanctions — primarily a US tool — target non-US persons for conducting otherwise lawful business with designated parties. Under programs like CAATSA and Iran secondary sanctions, foreign companies and individuals risk being cut off from the US financial system, losing correspondent banking relationships, or facing their own designation for ‘significant transactions’ with sanctioned entities. Thresholds for triggering secondary exposure are often undefined, creating compliance uncertainty. Risk assessment requires analysing transaction volume, knowledge of counterparty status, and sector-specific guidance from OFAC, particularly regarding Russia and Iran-related dealings.

Our Practice Areas

Related Services

OFAC Sanctions Defence

Defend against US sanctions listings

Asset Recovery

Recover frozen or seized international assets

Financial Investigations

Cross-border financial crime & asset tracing

White-Collar Defence

International financial crime defence

Extradition Defence

Fight extradition requests internationally

Red Notice Removal

Remove your Interpol notice via the CCF

Planet